Community
Advertise with us
Today's top ads | Jobs | Cars | Homes | Yellow pages | Videos
Former Mayor Laffey weighs in on the budget
by Russell J. Moore
Dec 16, 2009 | 1258 views | 14 14 comments | 15 15 recommendations | email to a friend | print
During an exclusive interview yesterday with The Herald, former Cranston Mayor Stephen Laffey, reportedly planning a run for Governor next year, said that the state’s budgetary problems, and the fact that they’ve become local budget problems, should surprise nobody who has been paying attention.

Governor Donald Carcieri announced on Monday that he was proposing a $125 million cut in aid to cities and towns. The cut would cost Cranston $6.6 million in state aid.

Laffey has been sounding the fiscal alarm in op-ed pieces and talk radio appearances for the last several years. He will not yet acknowledge whether or not he is running for Governor.

For the last several years, the state budget, he said, has been based on one-time fixes like the approximate $230 million in federal stimulus funds used to balance this year’s budget, rosy revenue projections that could never be realized, and irresponsible borrowing in the form of tax anticipation notes (think of payday lending).

The end result, he said, are drastic mid-year reductions in aid, leaving cities and towns with little leeway to cope.

Laffey said that every legislator who voted for the budget, and Governor Donald Carcieri, a fellow Republican who signed it, should not be in office.

“Everyone involved should resign. Either they didn’t know it would come to this, or they did and I’m not sure which is worse,” said Laffey.

Sounding every bit like a candidate for Governor, Laffey said the state’s political landscape is in need of a serious makeover. At a press conference to announce the appointment of a new economic development director late last week, talk centered on the need for everyone to “work together” to find solutions. Laffey, however, who didn’t attend the event, suggested that the approach was misguided. Instead, he said the state needs reformers who are ready for a battle.

“The bottom line is we’re going to need somebody, or a group of people, to run for public office who will take the fight to the established political order, and by that I mean the public sector union leaders and the General Assembly,” said Laffey. “There needs to be a direct fight … and unless we do that, we’ll continue on the road to collapse.”

Laffey didn’t hesitate to offer solutions.

Laffey said the state should end the pension system, which costs state and local taxpayers about $500 million per year. The move would lead to property tax cuts. Laffey said the state should take the existing pension fund and divide it up among the workers that have paid into it.

Laffey also said the state’s cities and towns need relief from onerous mandates like minimum manning requirements, legislation that would force public sector employees to pay higher co-share payments on health insurance, and ending the Carruolo Act, which allows school districts to sue municipalities for more funding. The mandates were largely proposed in Carcieri’s Supplemental Budget Proposal, as they were in previous years. The legislature has never approved any of the reforms.

Laffey also said the state needs to adopt the federal guidelines for welfare signed by President William Clinton in the nineties. Rhode Island’s welfare program is considered more generous than the federal government’s.

“We need to become a workfare state,” said Laffey.

A memo from Carcieri, which was inadvertently leaked to the media on Monday, seemed to agree with Laffey’s assessment about special interest groups.

“As I said earlier, our fiscal situation leaves us with only difficult choices. We have for too long now not tackled the tough issues and given in too early to special interests. We can no longer afford to operate as business as usual,” reads the Carcieri memo.

comments (14)
« breaking eggs... wrote on Tuesday, Dec 22 at 09:51 AM »
without a doubt.... the former mayor did attempt to bust the guard's contracts.. but as they say... sometimes you've gotta break a few eggs to make an omelet..... i give him credit for playing smash mouth politics in order to rid the city of back room brokered union contracts.... we need more mavericks in office as opposed to those playdough fun factory political machine products we currently are forced to deal with....
« Wilson12 wrote on Monday, Dec 21 at 06:26 PM »
Crazy like a fox - Obviously you do not do your research. Everyone remembers Laffey from getting rid of the crossing guards and saving money. However, you skipped the part where a Superior Court judge, a year and a half later once the suit filed by the crossing guards made it to a ruling, found Laffey basically "tore up" a binding contract and awarded the crossing guards their back pay.

So basically the guards were paid while they were "fired" because when Laffey fired them, they had a binding contract. Also, the court proceedings from Laffey's soapbox stance against the crossing guards led to the highest legal fees in the city's history during Laffey's tenure. (For your "link", pull up the city's budget expenses during his term for legal costs)

While it's true that Laffey got rid of the crossing guards, he did so illegally and it cost the city more than if he just waited until their contract ran out. That's why they were replaced in the end - because by the time their lawsuit made it to a disposition, their contract had expired.

I'm not a union member, but I know how city governments are run and deal with legal contracts all the time.

It's comical to see you post a comment to post a link to Mr. Laffey's past when you are not even informed to your "case in point" argument for Laffey. Typical Laffey supporter.....Unaware of the facts
« crazy like a fox wrote on Monday, Dec 21 at 11:48 AM »
while the former mayor has been know to be overzealous, most of the time he has been spot on when it comes to identifying serious problems.

case in point, the crossing guard fiasco.... the most vocal opponents were... guess...... yeah, the unions!! well, after quite a tussle, the city won, and saved constituents tens of thousands of dollars...

the pension needs an equitable reform... cola's should be flushed.... most, MOST of the retirees here in this state are NOT guaranteed a cost of living increase....

for thos who criticize and sling mud at the mr laffey.. please respond and post your 'links' to those problems which you refer to regarding his previous private sector employ.... i look forward to reviewing your allegations...

yes, the former mayor must reduce his rancor.. but his dedication to others, both private and public, are nonpareil.

we need a governor with substantial fortitude in order to do business with those in the capitol...not someone who has a track record for kissing behind(s) and beholden to special interest groups which control the state.....

rule with an iron fist steve.... and remember, spare the rod and spoil the child....

boo hoo unions... the party will be coming to a much deserved end...
« anonymous wrote on Sunday, Dec 20 at 08:57 PM »
laffeys a boob

« 12we1 wrote on Sunday, Dec 20 at 05:41 PM »
Laffey is all we need, more comedians in office!
« CranstonBob wrote on Sunday, Dec 20 at 05:39 PM »
Laffey is a complete disgrace...Let's all remember his great "Harvard educated" idea for fixing the city when he was mayor - raises taxes 3 times at the state maximum! Great plan Mayor! Now this moron sits on the sidelines and throws tomatoes at the current state of affairs.

Why did he return to RI with his tail between his legs after apparently leaving to do "bigger and better things"?? Because everyone has caught on to his act, that's why. Has anyone looked at why he came back to RI after running Morgan Keegan?? Go ahead, do some research and find out why this guy is a joke...The easiest way is to Wikipedia his name, this will give you the basics, then look at some of the articles as to why he was fired from his big time job...

The truth hurts Crazy Laffey!!!!!!!
« RosKobar wrote on Saturday, Dec 19 at 10:31 AM »
Laffey's numbers are the problem. He knows most employer match their employee's 401k contribution. That's about the same as what goes into the public pension system. The unfunded liability comes about because government borrowed from the system - or failed to make the contribution.

If we are talking about non-matching 401k's - which some employers went to recently - then we are talking about a failed system which endangers workers in the long run and raises the likelihood of poverty for the elderly. A 401k is nothing more than a savings account in special wrapping.

Let's follow his lead: Get rid of pensions. Get rid of overtime protections and those annoying minimum wage laws. Privatize Social Security. Increase the cost of Medicare.

At one point our country had maximum wage laws. No doubt Crazy Steve would love to see that again.

His plan: Increase employee contributions to healthcare so that it is unaffordable. Smart move!

With fewer receiving healthcare, mortality rates will rise; hence, less need for pensions (we'll all either die sooner or continue working 'til we drop).

Laffey's a banker. Let's not forget who got this country into the mess it is currently in.
« Cranston Taxpayer wrote on Friday, Dec 18 at 03:57 PM »
Steve Laffey's idea about ending the pension sytem and dividing up the pension fund is the equivalent of the President or Congress just telling everyone we can't afford Social Security Benefits so we're just going to divide up the Social Security Fund end the program. His idea is not realistic. We need real ideas not extremist ideas.
« Garycb wrote on Friday, Dec 18 at 12:24 PM »
Mayor Laffey is right about one thing for sure, the current solutions are splineless. Case in point, the proposal by the Gov calls for elimination of formal pension COLA's in favor of "ad hoc" pension COLA's (translation - we are too gutless to call for their elimination altogether just like everyone in the private sector has had to deal with).

« big lou wrote on Thursday, Dec 17 at 11:05 PM »
Laffey is a disoriented moron who thinks he was sent to R.I. by the Lord. He needs massive medication.
« Fungless wrote on Thursday, Dec 17 at 08:59 AM »
Laffey is the only answer to this problem like it or not
« Not in Cranston wrote on Thursday, Dec 17 at 08:14 AM »
Laffey raised taxes in Cranston because they were undertaxed compared to the rest of the state and because the idiot voters there had kept putting in people that basically spent on credit. I don't see Cranston heading into default now like it was when Laffey was elected. It's not cheap to live there now, but the city is stable. That's what apathetic voters get.
« anonymous wrote on Thursday, Dec 17 at 07:15 AM »
How are we to trust Laffey for what he says. He raised taxes...let's not forget. Until these politicians reduce government and become more frugal, all they will do and can do is raise taxes. Rhode Island is tax heavy...too difficult to live in this state anymore. For the smallest state, we have too much government. Roger Williams must be rolling in his grave.
« Jim Q wrote on Thursday, Dec 17 at 01:42 AM »
I hope that Mr. Laffey makes a decision quickly. Run or do not run; but, don't leave us hangind out in the dark. No more games... the time is now.
 
 
 
event calendar Icon_info

Friday, 03, 2010
post a new event Icon_info

Warwick Mall Reopens
Warwick Mall Reopens
MORE Video Here