Goodbye 2016, what did we learn from you?

By Christopher Curran
Posted 12/28/16

2016 saw our nation upside down in search of change for change's sake and a globe rife with terror and uncertainty. As a result, a modern day carnival barker ascended to the presidency, England voted to abandon the European Union to its detriment and the

This item is available in full to subscribers.

Please log in to continue

E-mail
Password
Log in

Goodbye 2016, what did we learn from you?

Posted

2016 saw our nation upside down in search of change for change’s sake and a globe rife with terror and uncertainty. As a result, a modern day carnival barker ascended to the presidency, England voted to abandon the European Union to its detriment and the cancer of worldwide terrorism slaughtered innocents at home and abroad. Time and time again computer security was compromised and an American election had been effected by an intrusive foreign government. Syria continued to be a multifaceted catastrophe and a resulting overwhelming migration of the displaced has adversely affected most of Europe.

The fabric of United States society wore and tattered under the specter of perceived bigotry especially between the African-American community and law enforcement.

In Rhode Island, we lost the quintessential mayor of our capital city, the State Ethics Commission was re-empowered, a traditional school was revealed to be a nest of pedophiles, and the Raimondo administration scored a couple of fourth quarter wins after a year of touchbacks and fumbles.

Nevertheless, it is beneficial to review the events of the last 12 months and ascertain what lessons can be derived from what transpired.

Most uproarious, the election of Donald Trump to become our 45th President belied all conventional political wisdom and confounded accepted campaign practices. Boisterous and bombastic, accusatory and insulting, never before had America seen a candidate like Trump. One would think that Trump’s consistent outrageous behavior would exclude him from serious consideration. However, the electorate was thirsty for the inordinate after years of dwindling job opportunities and a descending standard of living. They sought a diametrically different potential style of governing than the status quo. By definition the Donald’s uniqueness foot that bill.

Additionally, Trump picked on a universal scapegoat in citing the problem of illegal immigrants. More than any other facet of Trump’s pitch to the voters, his strangeness and demonization of immigrants compelled distraught and disaffected elements of the electorate. Add to this equation, the disdain for the Democrat nominee Hillary Clinton, Donald Trump prevailed in the Electoral College and won the White House.

So what did we learn from this campaign season? First, the American people believe that their opportunities have eroded and they are willing to try almost anyone to lead the country in a different direction. Second, the resurgence of nationalism and nativism appealed to voters in this era of economic stagnancy and globalization.

Similar to America’s want of drastic change, the British rocked the world when the majority of Brits voted to leave the European Union in the Bexit vote. When polled the voters cited the loss of political control to the European Authority, the onslaught of newcomers from a borderless immigrant policy, and an eroding national identity from Union membership.

The unexpected result forced the resignation of Prime Minister David Cameron, and has left England in a quandary of how to forge numerous individual trade agreements with countries around the globe.

We learned that similar to the sentiments of many Americans, Brits felt their identities as Britons fading and they wanted to regain their sense of citizenship.

The apparition of terrorism and religious fanaticism continued to darken lives across the globe. Attacks at airports in Brussels, Belgium and Istanbul, Turkey, a family park in Pakistan, a nightclub in Orlando, Florida, and a seaport boulevard in France, proved no community was exempt from this particular evil. Many smaller incidents of malevolence tainted the headlines and emboldened the collective insanity of the perpetrators. To state that murder and mayhem is an expression of love for a religion is oxymoronic. All we can learn from these tragedies is to be hyper-vigilant for reasoning with myopic zealots is seemingly impossible.

Also pervasive and problematic was cyber-security. Since the advent of the worldwide internet in the 1990s, computer hackers have used their capabilities to steal credit card and personal identification information, have thwarted government transactions, and perhaps most onerous have used intrusions to effect foreign elections. The Central Intelligence Agency and the Federal Bureau of Investigation have confirmed that the Russian Federation has hacked the Democratic National Committee’s emails and disclosed them through Wiki-Leaks. Whether or not the disclosed materials which depicted caustic opinions about Hillary Clinton had any significant effect in the election is undetermined. Yet, what we did learn is that no matter how many firewalls or security roadblocks one believes they have to safeguard important information in this world of clouds, internet, and cyberspace nothing including the sovereignty of the election process is exempt from intrusion.

Sorrowfully, Syria was a continuing fiasco in 2016. Enabled by the missteps of the Obama foreign policy, the multi-factional civil war propelled thousands of refugees to flee into overburdened neighboring countries as well as to Europe. Germany especially has bore the aftermath of a misguided open door policy which has changed the political fortunes of Chancellor Angela Merkel. Also, the rise of petty crimes, assaults, and rape related to newcomers has created a sea change in the idea of acceptance of refugees not only in Germany but in the rest of Europe. What we can learn from this predicament is we cannot accept Syrian refugees into the United States without a thorough vetting process. This obviously is close to impossible considering documentation is unavailable from that war torn nation.

Here at home, African Americans continue to voice claims of injustice in their interactions with police. Suspects Alton Sterling and Philando Castile were killed by police under questionable circumstances. This year is not dissimilar to the last three years where incidences of law enforcement overreach resulted in the deaths of young black men. Besides activist organizations like “Black Lives Matter”, complaints have escalated into devilment as attacks on police. 20 police officers have been brutally murdered in ambushes and targeted responses. We have learned that in a split second police make life or death decisions and sometimes as human beings they can be wrong. We have also learned that suspects imperil themselves by not complying with police instruction. There are no easy answers and the pursuit of justice in practice is complicated and dangerous.

In the Ocean State, we lost our Providence icon, the controversial yet well beloved Mayor Buddy Cianci. In a hopeful sign of accountability, the State Ethics Commission had its oversight powers restored for the first time since 2009. Also, the heinous criminals who stole the innocence of children at Saint Georges School in Middletown were at least held civilly responsible. And giant windmills were no longer something to tilt at in consideration that Deep Water Wind went online off Block Island. It is now producing electricity for 17,000 residents.

Foolishly, Governor Raimondo’s administration suffered a series of hapless mistakes followed by a couple of late year triumphs. A 5 million dollar marketing scheme yielded a stupid slogan “Cooler and Warmer” with a rollout which featured erroneous information. Equally disappointing, was the implementation of the UHIP computer system by RI Health and Human Services in September. Clients suffered without the adequate wherewithal to survive and once again the state appeared incompetent.

A saving grace occurred in December, when Raimondo attracted through tax breaks and incentives the following business endeavors. Wexford Science and Technology will build an innovation center on the 195 land, Johnson and Johnson will have a health technology center which will employ 75 people, and Virgin Pulse will run a health and technology center on Fountain Street in the old Journal building.

Thus, we have learned that Raimondo’s apparent strengths are in engaging businesses on a deal by deal basis. However, when it comes to the operation of government the governor is found sadly lacking.

2016 taught us lessons about our American identity, the audacity of politics, the lackluster performance of government, and the unraveling of our social fabric. Hopefully, we will learn from these experiences and become better citizens. Perhaps more essentially, our leaders will learn a few lessons and become better officials. With the New Year, hope springs eternal.

Comments

3 comments on this item Please log in to comment by clicking here

  • davebarry109

    Mr. Howell, Your commentary reflect your liberal views. Your admiration for 'the former mayor of Providence', a crook who's impact is still affecting that city through corruption, and your disdain for a president-elect that hasn't even started office yet, show that you need to reflect on your bias. You speak highly of a crook and lowly of a democratically elected president who hasn't signed one bill, one executive order. Report facts. Temper your opinion. That should be your new year's resolution. G_d Bless.

    Monday, January 2, 2017 Report this

  • richardcorrente

    Dear Davebarry109,

    I don't understand why you call out John Howell for an article written by Christopher Curran.

    As for Buddy Cianci, he did more good for the City of Providence, in my opinion, than any other Mayor. For the record, the downtown revival and the changing of the direction of the Providence River, Waterfire etc. was financed with federal money costing the taxpayers almost nothing and has attracted millions of dollars into the City as a result. As far a his "crimes" the first one, kidnapping occurred when he caught his chauffeur having an affair with his wife. Buddy ordered the chauffeur into his office and confronted him with it. When the chauffeur decided to leave Buddy pointed his cigarette at him and said "You're not going anywhere!" (he often used his cigarette pointing as a visual prop). From that statement came the charge of kidnapping. Yeah, kidnapping a 6 foot 4 inch State Policeman with a cigarette. Wow, but they made it stick, because Buddy was making too many taxpayers happy and the political insiders hated his growing popularity.

    The second one came when Buddy ran as an Independent. Neither the Democrats nor the Republicans could take credit for his good deeds (and both parties wanted to!) so they both wanted him out. They got together and charged him with 28 made-up charges and do you remember which ONE they were finally able to convicted him on? That's right "conspiracy". That means he didn't commit ANY crimes, he just talked about one. The conversation probably went like this. "What about X, Y, or Z? Naw. We can't do that. It's illegal!" Well, since he talked about it, it's "conspiracy". (something EVERY politician is guilty of "talking" about)

    Cianci's real crime in my opinion, was not letting either party share the spotlight. I advised him to do that then and again when he ran for Mayor against Jorge Elorza. I also advised him to "own" his criminal record. Some of the greatest leaders of all time had one. Jesus Christ, Mohammed Ali, Martin Luther King, not bad company, but he allowed his criminal record to defeat him and he lost the election because of it, I believe.

    In either event, the above article was well written and informative. Shouldn't we embrace free press?

    Happy New Year Davebarry.

    Happy New Year everyone.

    Rick Corrente

    Friday, January 13, 2017 Report this

  • Straightnnarrow

    Mr Corrente writes "I also advised him to "own" his criminal record. Some of the greatest leaders of all time had one. Jesus Christ, Mohammed Ali, Martin Luther King, not bad company, but he allowed his criminal record to defeat him and he lost the election because of it, I believe." So Jesus Christ had a criminal record! Just for the record, Christ was indicted by the religious leaders for sedition and found innocent of all charges by Pontius Pilate saying "I find in him no fault at all". An indictment is not the same as a sentence, but apparently Mr Corrente is the judge, jury & executioner of Christ.

    Get ready to explain that comment to Christ when you meet him!

    Saturday, January 14, 2017 Report this