LETTERS

Change is not always bad, but this change is

Posted

Members of the Cranston City Council:

I am writing this letter to ask that you consider not supporting and voting against the upcoming city ordinance 10-17- 04, which will change the zone layout of the corner of Warwick Avenue and Park Avenue to a complete zone 3.

This neighborhood is built around a family oriented, small business lifestyle and a change of this magnitude would be, directly and indirectly, detrimental to hundreds of citizens in the city.

I would like to start by acknowledging that the land in question is indeed underdeveloped and underutilized, and we appreciate that the city is taking notice and agree that changes need to be made. However, this change in zone layout is not the change that we need and not what would be best for our community.

Within walking distance of this location, there are two gas stations, three convenient stores and many other small businesses. The opening of a zone 3 type of business would have a significant negative impact on all of these businesses and have detrimental effects for a lot of hard working and taxpaying Cranstonians.

For example, my mother has owned the gas station on 95 Warwick Avenue since 1995. As an immigrant to the United States and without an official degree, my mother and her former husband started this business with the few dollars that they had collected throughout their first jobs here. 

Many years later, she is still running this business alone, as a single mom who has suffered tremendously and been through more than what is fathomable by most of us. A single mother, left with over a million dollars in debt from a gambling ex-husband, was forced to fight through the hard times alone and continue to work countless hours to support my brother and I, put us through school and provide for us in every capacity.

Today, over 10 years after her divorce, when her business is finally starting to generate a profit because she is not as suffocated with the debt that was forced upon her, there is an attempt to bring in a competing company that would definitely shut down her doors for good and destroy her years of hard work.

My mother and the other business owners in the neighborhood are people who came to this country with a dream and hope to succeed and create a better life for themselves and their families. We should be proud of them for the progress they have each made on their respective businesses and support them in their endeavors.

We are living in a time where the country is being divided based on the views of some against immigrants. Let this be a prime example of what this country was built off of and how unification of immigrants and residents of a country this great can lead to a success of a community and nation.

Two years ago, we were in placed in a similar position; however our community came together and fought for the hard working individuals who own businesses and homes in the area. The council at the time felt compassion for them and stopped the ordinance from passing. 

Today, I urge you to listen to the community again and not fault them just because the owner of an underdeveloped property has failed to keep up with it and spend their time and energy to maintain a certain standard acceptable for the city, while the rest of the businesses have done so.

Change is not always bad, but this change is.

Garabed Tashian

Cranston

Comments

1 comment on this story | Please log in to comment by clicking here
Please log in or register to add your comment
JenniM

So what your saying is the city should protect your interests. What if when your Mom went to open her business all those years ago and she was shut out unfairly because of a current competing owner was trying to use his/her power to keep them out, think about that for a minute. If the project makes sense then good if it doesn't then kill it.

Tuesday, January 2