View on the News

The dysfunctional American election

By Christopher Curran
Posted 11/8/17

It strikes me that the election of Donald Trump to the presidency is emblematic of a much more complex issue than a Republican prevailing over a Democrat. One can ponder the reasons for his elevation and become perplexed as to what ulterior meaning to

This item is available in full to subscribers.

Please log in to continue

Log in
View on the News

The dysfunctional American election


It strikes me that the election of Donald Trump to the presidency is emblematic of a much more complex issue than a Republican prevailing over a Democrat. One can ponder the reasons for his elevation and become perplexed as to what ulterior meaning to our society his election might convey.

As with many elections for president, a hopeful electorate tends to imbue the candidate with characteristics and qualities that he or she may not possess. Yet, hope springs eternal and we yearn for our leaders to be good stewards of our interests only to be inevitably disappointed time and time again.

Having recently read the two definitive books on the 2016 election, Election 2016 by John Kinsellagh and Unbelievable, My Front Row Seat to the Craziest Campaign in American History by Katy Tur, I have come to some stark conclusions on where the sentiments of the American family may lie.

Most conspicuously, there appears to be a frustrated and angered “Voice of the People.” Seemingly since the Great Depression, there has not been such an atmosphere of despondency. So many fractured divergent voices were agonizing on why their lives have lost hopefulness. These unsettled voters were searching for someone culpable for their stagnant wages, their reliance on government subsidies in order for their families to survive, and their loss of dignity. They also suffered from the diminishing generational hope for a better life for their children.

During the campaign, the Donald seized upon the Hitlerian concept to pick common enemies and publicly hold them culpable for society’s ills redundantly. As a result, Trump gained stalwart idealistic supporters by way of this maniacal and illogical blame game.

It would be too simplistic to accuse the repellent and supercilious Hillary Clinton as an explanation of Trump’s triumph. Although Clinton’s insincerity was certainly a component of her defeat, her character flaws may not have been the deciding factor. Perhaps it was her manipulation of the Democrat primary process, which amounted to a stacked deck that hijacked the nomination from the true winner, socialist Senator Bernie Sanders. This underhanded treatment of Sanders, who actually galvanized a large portion of activist Democrats and young independents, may have alienated enough voters to take a chance on Trump to spite Hillary.

Nor would it be sensible to accuse Russian interference by way of social media as the reasons for the Donald gaining the Oval Office? The malevolent Russian government provably spread erroneous news about Clinton and other Democrats, but that factor had limited effect on the outcome of the election in my judgment. Readers who found credibility in Russian-generated posts on Instagram and Facebook would be too obtuse and gullible to cast a prudent vote on anything.

Nevertheless, unquestionably Donald Trump’s character deficits were exposed to a nauseating degree by the media and for that matter by his own reckless utterances. Yet, despite the avalanche of despicable information about both candidates, Trump won the Electoral College. Was this just a shot in the dark by voters? Or was this casting of votes an age-old choice of determining who was the supposed lesser of two evils? Or was the exercise of this election cycle a showcase of disgust and dysfunction in the American family?

In Katy Tur’s book about the election, she often refers to “Trumps’s Melodrama,” which is an accurate depiction of the sense of his campaign. The president’s run for the White House was much more visceral than contemplative. The downtrodden working class and lower middle class Americans who, in the new economy work two menial jobs to earn half as much as they used to earn with one, were receptive to melodrama. They needed someone to blame for their economic downfall and illegal immigrants, abject liberalism and globalism foot the bill nicely.

Steeped in emotionalism, Trump’s rallies sold erroneous ideas like building a fortress-like wall and circumventing established trade agreements by unilateral action. Even though the wall is unfeasible and trade agreements can only be modified through a complicated process involving international organizations and the congress, Trump’s wild assertions presented the illusion of hope to the beleaguered.

John Kinsellagh, in his work, cited the precise orchestration of Trump rallies where employed shills would stir chants of support and provoke men and women who were desperate for the promise of a receptive government. Despite Trump’s repeated fiction that “you are all going to be so rich” and “I am going to make America great again,” like baseball’s 1969 Miracle Mets – they wanted to believe.

The author also points out that Hillary’s political tone deafness regarding her lawyerly delivery of tired regurgitated Democrat ideas were not at all exciting or believable. Whereas, even though most of what Trump’s said was diatribe and dribble, he was effective because of his eruptive style.

Often castigated for being a reality star that ascended to the presidency, one must wonder whether the fact that Trump was a successful television personality is why he won. Perhaps we have reached a point in American society where presenting a pleasant fiction is more palatable than presenting facts and realistic plans for governing.

On the Democrat side Hillary was her own greatest enemy. She had long thought, since her defeat in the 2008 primary versus Barack Obama, that she was inevitably going to become president. Upon hearing that the Donald had clinched the Republican nomination, she and her campaign confidants rejoiced. They mistakenly perceived the bombastic and nonfactual Trump as infinitely beatable.

Not only did they underestimate the salability of Trump, but they did not adequately reckon how many Democrats would be alienated from the shabby and unfair treatment of Vermont Senator Bernie Sanders.

Case and point, former interim DNC Party Chairwoman Donna Brazile has cited in an excerpt from her upcoming book Hacks: The Inside Story of the Break-ins and Breakdowns that Put Donald Trump in the Whitehouse that Clinton “hijacked the party.” A deal was struck to ensure Hillary would be the nominee in exchange for Clinton campaign funds being invested in the DNC during the tenure of former chair Debbie Wasserman Schultz. Verifiably, Brazile uncovered the truth of the fixed primary election and felt compelled to notify Bernie Sanders, “By September 7, the day I called Bernie, I had found my proof and it broke my heart,” she said.

As a result, the backlash within the party faithful further promoted doubt about Clinton’s veracity, which was already tenuous. One could postulate that two normally Democrat leaning states, Florida and Pennsylvania, might have swung for Hillary. Since both states held a great many Sanders voters, Clinton could possibly be president now if she did not act so underhandedly and had won the nomination legitimately.

Another misnomer regarding the election was that Russian interference through social media significantly swayed the election. Yes, the Russian government obviously wanted Donald Trump to prevail. Seventeen United States security agencies have unquestionably confirmed this Russian election adventurism. Suggestive ads, erroneous news sites and all types of manipulative submissions to anti-Democrat groups were posed in a concerted effort to discredit Clinton. However, Hillary already brought more baggage than the luggage carousel at T.F. Green Airport into the election. If the Russian smear campaign had any effect, it was minimal.

All in all, the most pressing interrogative provoked by the events of the 2016 election is not actually the results themselves. The utter frustration of the electorate compelling them to embrace the most far-fetched of notions simply so they could garner some sense of hope in the country’s future is the real quandary.

Overall our quality of life and our capacity for hope has severely diminished over the years. We no longer perceive our country as the enviable nation we once were. A decade’s long stagnancy in congress, coupled with two lackluster presidencies in a row has blunted the voter’s spirit. Furthermore, the election of 2016 gave us an impossible choice between a condescending prevaricator and a narcissistic madman. Alas, the madman won.

After eleven months of his administration, no hope has been restored. I pray we have better choices three years from now so America can once again be the beacon of opportunity it once was.


7 comments on this story | Please log in to comment by clicking here
Please log in or register to add your comment

You've miss it entirely. to put it simply, Hillary Clinton is a pathologically corrupt Liar, with the blood of Americans on her greedy hands, and Russian and Chinese foreign illegal campaign money in her filthy pockets furthermore, The American people aren't as stupid or have as short term memories as she and all her cronies thought.

Wednesday, November 8, 2017

Listen, your article is spot on. Don’t let these naysayers, like the commenter below me tell you otherwise. Trump is a disaster. And we the people asked for it.

Wednesday, November 8, 2017

Skipper, one should not claim “Russian” anything when their sitting jerk in chief is accused of collusion and cheating the election. Your comment is as delusional and stupid as you must be.

Wednesday, November 8, 2017

We get who we deserve. Our political system has come to the point where it is who can raise/spend the most money wins. Elections are bought and sold like commodities. If you read political commentary, it is like reading the financial pages -- who has the most money, who raised the most last month, who spent the most, who got the most donations from corporate "citizens", etc.

That is why Bernie sent chills down the mainstream pols spines. He wasn't spending that much comparatively and was getting his message out and gaining support outside the power structure. He was a rogue candidate that had to be stopped by both the Republicans and Democrats. He represented an ideal that the Constitution and not capitalism might just win.

Wall Street won. Doesn't matter if it is President Trump or President Clinton -- we live with President Citicorp.

Thursday, November 9, 2017

To: RIRED401886

Well the truth will come out very soon. So far Muller hasn't found ANY evidence to connect PRESIDENT Trump with any Russian misdealings.

I realize you're a delusional Trump hating nitwit because the more they investigate the Dumbocrats, and DNC, the more corruption and collusion they find. Of course they're so busy over at the DNC stabbing each other in the back and ducking for cover? Cutco can't make the knives fast enough!

Where do you think Hillary's "Gift" from the Russian government went for brokering the Uranium One deal? I also could have said Illegal Saudi Arabia campaign money, also from the UAE, Qatar, Algeria, Brunei, Kuwait and Oman. Don't forget China and WHILE she was secretary of State.

Go back to watching MSNBC, CNN and reading The Huffington Post they'll tell you exactly what you want to hear........

Friday, November 10, 2017

It's been a year and the long National Tantrum continues...

The anniversary protests were a washout- I guess Antifa (an ironic moniker to say the least) members' moms forgot to go to the basement and wake them up or weren't available to give them a ride to the protests.

RI is in horrible shape regardless of who is in power in DC- this seems to be lost on everyone except those who have moved away. Even during the Obumbler years, with a Democrat RI GA and control of the White house and both houses of Congress, the media constantly blamed "The Republicans! The Republicans!", and RI buys it hook, line and sinker- distraction at its finest, like watching a magician at work.

The DNC and Hillary have only themselves to blame; for two years, they ridiculed, scandalized or outright ignored the 16 other Republican candidates in the mistaken belief that Hillary could only beat the duly elected President Trump. The meeting between media elites and DNC leadership in April 2016 to coordinate their efforts has been exposed- great reading for anyone who cares to look it up.

Only now is the American public starting to see the extent of corruption and Russian collusion by the Left, not the Right, during the 2016 race. There's an old newsroom saying: "If you want to know what the Left is up to, see what they're accusing the Right of doing". The media has also lost whatever was left of their credibility.

Unfortunately for them (but fortunately for the world), the DNC leadership failed to recognize what a disaster Hillary was going to be, how unlikable, unfit, dishonest, incompetent and unhealthy she is; however, they owed her for stepping aside and playing ball in 2008 and she was given the plum SoS position for doing so and promised the 2016 nomination.

It's fun watching the self-righteous, virtue-signaling Hollywood elite and now the DNC turn on themselves, like watching a snake eat its own tail.

Bon Appetit!

Friday, November 10, 2017

"The election of 2016 gave us an impossible choice between a condescending prevaricator and a narcissistic madman. Alas, the madman won." No, We had a great choice! In fact, it was the first time in a generation that we actually had a choice between the effete, elite establishment of both parties and everyday Americans.

CC is a loser and has been blinded by his own self righteousness and will never come clean with whom he voted for. Or did he just sit it out pretending to be middle of the road.

Saturday, November 11, 2017